Organic Transit’s ‘ELF’ Velomobile on Kickstarter

Photo of white ELF velomobileThe ELF is a relatively large electric assist velomobile currently being developed by Organic Transit in the US.  Australian Tech Blog Gizmag recently posted an article highlighting the combined human and solar power sources utilised by the ELF, and also the proposed price of $4,000, which they compared favourably to two other North American produced velombiles, the Hornet ($5,700) and the Tripod ($7,450).

Organic Transit (OT) have adopted a somewhat different design approach to their velomobile, and that, combined with a Kickstarter campaign, is the secret to the relatively low cost.  The campaign has been very successful so far, and, with more than 3 weeks still remaining, they have raised more than 125% of the original $100,000 goal.  They have already produced several prototypes which have been used to refine the design and build process.  Their plan is to release the first 100 production units through Kickstarter.

As is customary on Kickstarter a promotional video has been produced highlighting the proposed product. This can be viewed below.  There is also a fairly extensive write up of the development process that OT has gone through to reach this stage on their Kickstarter page.  It is particularly interesting that they plan to replace a hand-laid GRP process, that takes two hours to build a body panel, with a vacuum moulded ABS process that takes a mere 12 minutes!

From the above sources and the OT FAQ several interesting facts can be gleaned.

Orgainc Transit are primarily based in Durham, North Carolina but have team members in several states.  The team behind the ELF are professional with strong connections to the US Human Powered Vehicle movement.  Perhaps the most well known is C. Michael Lewis, who will be known to some as the artist behind numerous velomobile and HPV posters, such as those for Battle Mountain and ROAM.

Photo of ELF velomobile and staff outside Organic Transit's premises While currently operating out of a former furniture store in downtown Durham, they have ambitions not only to sell the ELF, and it’s stable-mate the TruckIt, but more globally, to set up micro-factories producing the ELF in “every downtown.”  To-date they have had enquiries from many places, including Europe, and they are seriously looking into ways to supply markets further afield than the US.

OT have followed the “Keep it simple” philosophy and are quite clear that they are not intending to compete with the more established, and more aerodynamic, velomobiles such as the Quest and the Mango.  Their target is the thoroughly practical user who wants a highly visible vehicle with a large carrying capability and to whom speed is not a significant consideration.  Hence the ELF is large – 8′ x 43″ x 5′ (2.4 x 1 x 1.5 m) and heavy – 100 lbs (45 kg).

To avoid the cost and complexity of suspension, OT have opted to use the standard MTB size of 26″ on all wheels, with large diameter tyres to smooth the ride.  While simpler this does pose a concern as the front wheels will have to resist lateral forces not normally experienced by bicycle wheels and these forces are a function of the vehicle weight.  The consensus so far on successful trikes and velomobiles has been to restrict the size of these wheels to not more than 20″.

Photo of an ELF prototype parked in the streatThe purist will reject the reliance on electric assist and there has been some perhaps unfair criticism of the ELF’s weight, but this should not be an undue problem for the intended user.  However, as there is reference to options to add: doors, floor and other extras; one can see the weight rising as the design begins to bloat.  One nice feature is the integrated solar panels which allow the batteries to be trickle charged during the day, assuming access to adequate sunlight.  Otherwise the standard battery pack takes two hours to charge.

To conform to regulations, allowing the ELF to be classified as a bike, assisted top-speed is limited to 20 mph (32 km/h), but there is no reason why the rider can’t push the vehicle faster if they have the strength or gravity on their side.  The following video is taken from an ELF driver’s eye view, about mid way through you hear a conversation between the ELF’s rider and a truck-driver about the potential speeds.

While the debate about “fast cycles” continues to rumble on, the current regulations, particularly those in Europe, that govern e-bikes and their classification impose relatively onerous requirements on vehicles that are classed as “more than a bike”.  This makes it challenging to successfully develop and market a vehicle of this type.  A recent article on the Low Tech Magazine blog, albeit featuring the highly aerodynamic WAW velomobile, argues the virtues of electric assisted velomobiles, much of which  applies to the ELF, the second part of the article also goes into some of the issues with the current legislation.

One velomobile mentioned by the Low Tech article is the 55 kg Aerorider, developed in the mid 2000s.  This vehicle with many similar attributes to the ELF failed to be commercially successful due to a combination of high cost, weight and the limitations imposed by regulation.  It would be reasonable to say that if regulation had been favourable for a class of “fast bikes” the Aerorider would have done much better.  As it stands the Aerorider was redesigned as the Sunrider which has now passed into the hands of Alligt, and Alligt are doing their part to lobby for a fast-bike class (snelfiets).  As Alligt now have access to the moulds and tooling for the original Aerorider, should regulations change, one never knows, the Aerorider may ride again.  Hopefully the ELF will continue to progress and, though lower cost, a different market and simplicity, be more successful than the Aerorider proved to be.

Velomobile News from Holland

A couple of news items from Holland.

Sinner to Cease Recumbent Bike Production?

According to Ligtfiets.net Sinner is to stop producing the Demon and Spirit recumbent bikes, instead concentrating their efforts on the Comfort delta trike and the Mango velomobile.  A quick review of the Sinner website turned up no information but Ligtfiets advise that existing stock of the Spirit and Demon will continue to be sold.

Mark 2 Sunrider is to be made available as a kit and branded the Alligt A9

Alligt have a photo of the new Sunrider body with the different elements highlighted in one of the three standard body colours.  There is a caveat that the actual shade of yellow will be slightly different from that shown, but it gives a nice idea of how the finished machine is assembled.  The most obvious changes are the the rear of the body with a squarer ending reminiscent of the Versatile/Orca but there are quite a number of other more subtle changes to the body which should improve water-tightness and sound.

Alligt A9 body in colourWhat is not visible here are the substantial sub-frame and numerous standard Alligt components that have been incorporated into the design.

The particularly interesting news is that the Sunrider will be available as a self build kit along side the A4, A6, A7 and A8.  Not too surprisingly the kit will be sold as the A9.

Prices in Euros are available via the Alligt website but to summarise, depending on options: the A9 kit will range from 4,195 to 7,395; and a completed Sunrider ranges from 6,595 to 8,895.  A “Moped” class Sunrider is also available suitable for type-approval in Germany for 10,595.Photo of mark 2 Sunrider prototype

 

Roll Over America – The Book!

ROAM logoThe Roll Over America (ROAM) velomobile tour which took place in 2011 is now documented in book form.  Available either as an iBook for iOS 5 or 210 Mb PDF from Google Docs, Josef Janning chronicles the story of the first ever velomobile tour across the United States from Oregon to Washington D.C.  The 210 pages cover the 28 day, 5300 km journey in detail, together with additional material and comments from riders and observers.

Cover of ROAM the storyAs one would expect the opening chapter deals with the background and planning for the tour.  The book also closes with a number of after thoughts and hints at possible future tours of a similar kind in both the US and other parts of the world.

It is good to see ROAM documented in this, more permanent, fashion as the original site at http://www.rolloveramerica.eu, while reserved, no longer has any content accessible, demonstrating the frustratingly short life cycle of too much of the information available on the internet.

Oliebollentocht

Oliebollentocht LogoIt is the time of year in Holland in which Oliebollen are cooked and eaten.  It is also about the time of year when a large number of velonauts gather for what is the world’s largest social velomobile ride – the Oliebollentocht.

Oliebollen are a spiced fruity dough-ball fried and traditionally eaten in Holland around the end of the year so in other words Oliebollentocht is Dutch Doughnut Time.  The Oliebollentocht velomobile gatherings have been held yearly in various locations in the Netherlands, and the 17th such gathering is to be held on the last Saturday of December in Zwolle, about a week from now.

The following video produced by David Hembrow and available on his blog – A view from the cycle path – illustrates the experience from a velonaut’s eye view in the 2009 Oliebollentocht held in Utrecht.

Organised through the Dutch HPV site ligfiets.net there is a page with more details for those wishing to participate.  This is strictly a velomobile-only event.  This year the exclusivity perhaps takes on more significance, as velomobiles have been excluded for the first time from participating in a similar event, the Elfstedenfietstocht, despite participating without incident in previous years.

Last year there was a record number of 149 velomobiles in attendance and there will be high hopes to break that record next Saturday.  The following video shows a selection of the assembled velomobiles presumably while most of the riders are inside consuming Oliebollen and coffee.

The following video is a Dutch TV report of the same event and contains some nice shots.  There are also English subtitles which helps for those without Dutch.

All-in-all good promotion of the velomobile helping to raise the awareness of the concept in Holland and possibly elsewhere too.

Dr Alex Moulton CBE

It is with sadness that we note the passing of Alex Moulton on the 9th December 2012 at the age of 92.  A tribute page has been set up at http://www.alexmoulton.co.uk.  A nice potted summary of his life is given on the Moulton Bicyle Company Heritage page.

Best known for developing the suspension system used on the original Mini and then designing the series of revolutionary small wheeled suspended bicycles that bear his name, which are still produced today, he also was active in contributing to the HPV comunity.  He presented papers at two of the IHPVA international symposia and added comments in the columns of Human Power.  He also authored or contributed to a number of books including a biographical interview with the cycle historian John Pinkerton and an excellent engineering reference book, the Moulton Formulae and Methods.  As such his legacy will live on.

Active until the end he was a living demonstration of the benefits of regular cycling both to the individual and to society.  The following short interview was taken earlier this year.

The following short “Made in Britain” film gives an overview of his work and the Moulton Bicycle company – a fitting tribute.

POSTSCRIPT:

While writing this post I spent some time looking for what I believe was an Open University lecture about Moulton covering the manufacture and the philosophy behind the design and it’s development.  The page where I first saw it on Cozy Beehive points to a non-existent Google video.   Does anyone know where to find it now?

Graeme Obree’s Beastie undergoes full fairing trial

World Human Powered Speed Championships 2012 PosterAfter pulling out of the World Human Powered Speed Challenge last September due to an unready machine, Graeme has continued to work on his Beastie.  Development has now reached a stage where fully faired trials can take place and a Scottish venue has been found.  The Bicycle Design blog reported on trials that took place at Machrihanish in Argyle.  The site is a former RAF airfield with a 10,000 ft or 3 km (1.8 mile) runway, though part is still used as Campbelltown Airport.  Being both quiet and having the longest public runway in Scotland makes this ideal for Graeme’s attempt, given his self-imposed constraints.  He will however loose all the advantage of altitude at Battle Mountain, as Machrihanish’s runway is very close to sea-level.

The trial itself was limited by weather in particular the inability to see through the spray landing on the fairing.  This necessitated some surgery to the front to open a viewing port but Graeme reported that the Beastie handled very well.

Photo of the Beastie setting out down Machrihanish's RunwayHaving confirmed the design there will be further tweaks, particularly to the fairing, and then a wait for ideal weather.

Photo of the Beastiemuch more full report with more images is available on Human’s Invent.  Human’s iNvent are also to be credited for the above photos.

We have been busy & helmets

It has been some time since I posted anything, not because there has been nothing to write about, rather I have been too busy with other things working on the website back-end. The observant may have noted a few small changes which reflect this, and there is more to come, but more of that later.  There are also a couple of posts I am working on that should be up shortly.

Car driver wearing a HelmetMean while I thought I would link to this report via BikeBiz on the recent debate on “cycle safety” in the British parliament.  It is depressing!  It is particularly depressing that so much parliamentary time was wasted going round in circles, seemingly blind to the point, that it is high-speed heavy vehicles that are the danger, not cycling itself, and polystyrene helmets offer NO PROTECTION against such a danger.  That blindness, a blindness which kills in an altogether more subtile way, is what makes cyclists/blogosphere/twitersphere so mad.

The unscientific, irrational, and too often bullying, level of debate is seriously distracting from real solutions to improve on road safety.  Technology has become the god of our age.  While I am most certainly not anti-technology, I find it very troubling that there is such blind faith in technology, and that the general public are too willing receive the claims that liars marketers make concerning their wares, especially when the wares “might” save the life, say of a child.  This faith is dangerously miss-placed. Safety costs! and unfortunately helmets are viewed by too many as a simple and cheap solution.  The parody video below and the cartoon at the start highlight, that there are many areas where real safety improvements could be made and, if the arguments of cycle helmet proponents were followed, would require mandatory wearing of PPE.

In an age driven by imagery, icons and what can be seen externally, the idea of a helmet as a guaranteed provider of protection, if not invincibility, is ingrained in the general public.  Images of soldiers in bullet proof helmets, construction workers in hard hats, motorcyclists in crash helmets, all of which have saved lives, seem to prove that cycle helmets and compulsion to wear them MUST be a good thing.  The following might just change your mind:

A couple of key points from this video:

  • Average speed of collision 40 km/h ( mph)
  • Maximum speed at which a cycle helmet offers any protection 20 km/h ( mph).

While proponents point to motorcycle helmets and seatbelts, there is a failure to understand the dynamic differences between, the way such safety devices work, and how a cycle helmet is supposed to work.  Last night I did a simple experiment and broke a cycle helmet with my bare hands something I could not do to a human skull or a motorcycle helmet.  I have made reference before to a cycle accident I was involved in, in 1988, in which a cycle helmet (which I was not wearing) did not save my life! – When I get time and energy I plan on writing up a more detailed account including some technical analysis – In that event my skull exceeded the performance requirements of a cycle helmet!

The “protection” provided by a cycle helmet – vertical impact between 12 & 15 mph – is artificial and highly contrived, you may note from the video above what part of the dummy’s head usually strikes the car, and I am sure many others could confirm the same from their own experience.  As my experiment demonstrated a cycle helmet offers next to no protection in the case of side impact.  My accident mentioned above was an exception as I hit a vehicle with what was essentially a vertical impact (my face was looking down) at about 20 mph.  I have come off my bike a handful of times since, and on no occasion has my head recieved any injury.  It should also be noted that the theoretical efficacy of helmets is very much dependent on the proper fitting and attachment of the helmet to the head of the rider.  I think it would be safe to say that in most cases, outside of professional cycle sport, helmets are worn incorrectly.

The argument “if it saves a life” is disingenuous.  The assumption is that they will do no harm even if they do no good.  Evidence is mounting that statistically this is not the case.  Thankfully the parliamentary debate attempted to recognize this, as cycling’s health and life benefits far exceed any risks; but also analytically, this assumption is not true.  Helmets, like drugs and medicines, have side-effects:

  • They make your head bigger – thus increasing the chances of striking or being struck by another object
  • They alter the shape of your head – thus altering the natural way your body interacts with its environment – this can affect perception, balance and response in an accident
  • They, in most cases, cover your head in an array of convenient grab handles – thus increasing the chances of snagging, leading to the very kind of rotational head and brain injury which results in death or serious life impairment
  • They attach a hangman’s noose to your head – a fact tragically illustrated by the 14 documented case where little children died by strangulation while playing wearing a cycle helmet

If it saves 1 life but kills 20 it is not worth it! I recommend reviewing the scientific data available via cyclehelmets.org.

Legal compulsion sends a most unwanted message: generating a false sense of security, to both riders and drivers, leading directly to increased complacency and then injury and death when the “force-field” fails to protect in an accident vehicle incident.  It also criminalises, and therefore harms, those who recognize the physical dangers of helmet wearing as well as the limited protection they offer.  The comments of Graeme King after the BikeBiz article are very pertinent.

The Cycle Show 2012 Report

Here at last is the promised report on this year’s Cycle Show.

2012 is the second year the show has been held at the NEC in Birmingham. It is also the second time I was able to attend, what aspires to be, the premier cycle trade event in the UK. However, with the current growth in cycling, the Cycle Show is beginning to face some competition from other new trade shows, that are developing in other parts of the country. The previous occasion I attended was in 2010, the last time the Cycle Show was held in London.

Photo of NEC atrium entranceThe move to the NEC was intended to broaden the appeal and hopefully attract a greater number of attendees than the previous venue at Earl’s Court in London. The NEC venue, with it’s central location in the British Midlands and good road and rail transport links, is well placed to provide this, and I think the figures from this year’s show, prove the decision to move, was a good thing. For myself, a London based show was preferable, as it is always possible to stay with friends, and then use their home as a base from which to visit, without having to make a long commute. None-the-less I, and a little helper, were able to make a day trip to Birmingham via the train, but it was something of an epic journey.

This being my first ever visit to the NEC, I was impressed by the shear volume of exhibition space. With it’s twenty-something halls, which can be opened up to create a multi-hall venue, the location is well able to accommodate future growth. The Cycle Show occupied three of these halls (9, 10 and 11), and according to Cycle Show figures had an 11% increase in trade stand space over 2010. While attendance in 2011 was down it was up by 30% this year and surpassed the 2010 figures.

As one would expect the show is dominated with sports cycling particularly road racing and BMX, two sports that have been much in the spotlight since the Olympics earlier this year. However there was still plenty to see relating to more practical cycle use, and again one was impressed with a large area, in hall 11, given to electric bikes and systems. The evident increase in this sector since 2010, is a reflection of the massive growth being seen, as the technology has begun to mature and become a much more practical option.  From a personal point of view, there did seem to be something lacking, and I am hard-pressed to put my finger on it. There were a number of exhibitors missing, which I had seen in London, but these should have been made up by others who were new to the show. Perhaps Earl’s Court had a slightly more intimate feel, but that was probably due to the cramped condition of a show, that had reached the venue’s capacity. Maybe the balance between sports and utility cycling was different, and not to my taste, I’m not sure. It is still early days for the new venue, so comparisons may not be altogether fair, however the prospects for the future look good. Hopefully this year’s figures will encourage the absent to make the effort to attend next year.

Photo of ElectricBike stand at the 2012 Cycle ShowThe main entrance was through hall 11 and it was in this hall where the first item of velomobile interest could be found. Here Peter Eland was manning the Velovision/Electric Bike stand, the link with Electric Bike magazine and the surrounding exhibitors was obvious. After chatting with Peter, he directed us to the Ocean Cycle stand, which had been moved from hall 10 to the other side of the electric bike area in 11.

Photo of red Ocean Cycles Challenger with front opening canopyOcean Cycle were exhibiting two Challenger velomobiles one of which was equipped with a Sunstar electric assist system. The two models also illustrated different hood mounting options. One designed to open sideways in the style of the Cab-Bike and the other tilting forwards in the style of the Leitra.

Photo of a black Ocean Cycles Challenger with side opening canopyOcean Cycle is the work of Marcin Szewczyk. He and a colleague Chris, were on the stand demonstrating the machines and answering questions, and while I was there, they seemed to be getting plenty of attention. Marcin can be seen, in the rather fuzzy photo, of the black Challenger. Ocean Cycle make some other recumbent specific products but the Challenger is very much their flagship.

The Challenger itself is built on the ICE Sprint trike, also made in Cornwall. The velomobile is available, both as a kit to mount on a trike you already own, or as a complete ready-to-ride velomobile. The weight for the complete machine comes in at 32 kg, which is not bad, the body alone being 16 kg.

Photo of interior of black Ocean Cycles ChallengerThe fairing is made from glass fibre, with a number of small detail areas reinforced with carbon fibre. Being a fairing-on-frame type, the body is quite light-weight, and might feel a little flimsy, to those used to monocoque or self supporting velomobiles, but it is capable of supporting your own weight as you get in and out.

The Sprint is ICE’s “in-between” model not as low, and therefore fast, as the Vortex, but lower than the “go far” Adventure. As such the seat in the Challenger is quite low. However any disadvantage this might pose is offset, by both the ease of entry, and the lower centre of gravity – a definite advantage for handling at speed.

Photo of red Ocean Cycles ChallengerThe Challenger’s external styling is certainly attractive, but such styling can sometimes result in some loss of function internally. Looking at the Challenger one is immediately concerned that the rider’s road view will be overly restricted. Sitting inside however, I found the view to be reasonable and the cabin had plenty of space, but, as with the machines I sampled at SPEZI, a static assessment is not enough, and a real world test ride is needed to make a final judgement.

Photo of interior of the Challenger showing the wiper handleI did attempt to take a panoramic shot of the view from inside but, not surprisingly at such close range, it was unsuccessful. One nice feature, which again needs real world assessment, is the windscreen wiper fitted to the hood. This is operated by a convenient handle from the inside, and should go a long way to solving the wet weather visibility problems experienced by most head-in velomobiles. A visit to Ocean Cycle, and a test ride, are things I plan to do in the coming months, time and finance permitting. Meanwhile if there are any readers with first hand experience of the Challenger in the “wild” then please add your comments below.

Marcin and Chris have been very helpful, and naturally want to get the word out, contact details are on the Ocean Cycle website, and I do recommend taking the opportunity to visit and take a test ride, as I hope to shortly.  It will be good to see more of these machines on the road soon.

Photo of ICE Sprint trike with Sunstar iBike system battery mounting The next stand I visited was Sunstar. Sunstar is a multinational corporation with Japanese roots and quite a diverse range of interests, ranging from toiletries to motorcycle parts! Their eAssist system falls under their Environment & Amenity division.

Photo of ICE Sprint trike with Sunstar iBike system installedOn their stand, they had a number of cycles fitted with examples their system. One of these was an ICE Sprint as used in the Challenger which gave a good opportunity to view the installation from all angles. The Sunstar system is designed to be fitted to most cycles as an after-market upgrade, and looked quite tidy and impressive, in a quiet sort of way. More information is available via their website.

An after-show email from SparticleBikes, who seem to be representing the Sunstar system in the UK, highlighted the proven reliability of the system – Tried, tested and evolved for 10 years in Japan, and pointed to a demonstration video showing the ease of fitment. They also added the following photo of a recently retrofitted Challenger.Photo of a Challenger Velomobile

The other recumbents to be seen at the show, were designs tailored to special needs rider requirements, and while interesting in their own right, have little to offer the velomobile enthusiast that is not better catered for elsewhere.

The rest of the day was spent visiting other stands and going over the the mainstream cycle offerings. Perhaps the most interesting of these were the cycle tracking systems from Spybike and Eagle Hound, and the arm mounted signal indicator from Indic8or.

While theft of a velomobile is very rare, they naturally stand out and draw attention, not something a thief wants, it does occasionally occur. As velomobiles become more ubiquitous and socially accepted, their high value will make them more of a target of theft, and therefore a tracking system, which enables the safe recovery, and hopefully the capture and charging of the thief, will be a welcome option. Most trackers are designed to be hidden somewhere inside the tubular frames of regular bikes, which restricts their application for both recumbents and velomobiles. Though I’m sure someone could devise a creative way to embed these somewhere in a velomobile.

The system from Spybike was particularly interesting, as they also offer a none-tubular variant, designed to be mounted on a motorcycle. The only catch being that it presently depends on a 12 volt supply, as normally provided by a motor vehicle battery.

All-in-all it was an interesting show and I believe there is reason to look forward to next year.

Dryve – A New Velomobile in Development

Following on from the Softshell Velomobile Recumbent Gallery also mentioned that AZUB were developing a velomobile.  They then referred the reader to AZUB’s 2012 catalogue which is available online through ISSUU.

The catalogue dedicates two pages, 52 and 53, to the Dryve velomobile.  The work has been done in conjunction with a German industrial designer, Johannes Rave.  For those who take issue with ISSUU, and I find it painfully slow on older PCs, the english text is quoted below:

Dryve – AZUB project of fabric fairing for recumbent trikes
AZUB Dryve is a project of mixed alu/fabric fairing designed for all three models of AZUB trikes. There are a few goals we wanted to reach:

 

    • Quite light construction of a fully faired trike which can be used in different types of weather with the rider still comfortable inside.
    • Using a fabric which can be stretched a bit in the way to use its properties (covered wheels, unusual entrance etc.)
    • Affordable price which cannot be obviously reached by construction from Composite.
    • Good looking – a bit car-like-style design with focus on function and practical daily use allowing to transport larger luggage and/or hauling a trailer. The aerodynamic shape is not our primary goal as the construction from fabric cannot really be very aerodynamic.
    • Possibility of easy assembly of electric motor.
    • Possibiiity of riding the trike without fairing in the hot months of the year.
    • Small size for transport from AZUB to customer so the shipping price is not sky high like when delivering a composite body which is huge and has to be protected a lot.

We were dreaming about such a machine for couple of years and then we were contacted by a German student of industrial design from The University in Pforzhelm, Johannes Rave who wanted to design such a fairing for his diploma work. His timing was really perfect and he had at least s.ome experience with this project from some of his seminar work so we started to work together and after some months the project took shape and the very first prototype was made.

 

We just started to test it (spring 2012) and we already know there are tons of problems which have to be solved from absolutely new ideas lhat have never been tested before. We are very optimistic and are looking forward to new developments. The final product should be introduced during 2013.

I must say I admire wordplay in the name and logo they have chosen.  AZUB go on to briefly profile Johannes and point the reader to his website.

Johannes Rave, born 1985, is a German industrial designer who worked together with AZUB on the DRYVE as his final project in summer 2011. He is living in Pforzheim. Germany, where he works on projects for a sustainable future.

Johannes Rave,

www.johannesrave.eu

At the time of writing his website is pending a relaunch.  Meanwhile his front page presents the following nice rendering.

A Velomobile Concept with a Fabric Skin

On interesting detail from the description of the Zampano, mentioned yesterday, was the use of fabric in the weather-proof body.  Fabrics have been used before and various “socks” can be made or obtained, to extend the covering provided by a partial fairing which you might see mounted on a recumbent.  Modern materials developed for out-door clothing find a ready application here, and the functionality is no doubt much appreciated by the recumbent rider, as they make their way through the end of year weather.  One negative  that immediately impresses when you look at such coverings, is the lack of style, due in a large part to the rather limited aerodynamic form which has been achieved.

This criticism however, need not be.  Recumbent Gallery recently profiled a velomobile concept which as appeared on a number of design blogs by a Czech designer Martin Miklica.  I have been unable to locate a website for Martin or his work but he evidently has other interests beside human powered transport.  His concept for a four wheel, two seat, socialble basicly involves a light-weight rigid frame covered by a Softshell “stretchy” fabric.  For all the criticisms one thing this vehicle does not lack is form and style.

Like so many concepts, once you look past the slick photo-real renderings, the engineer sees numerous technical  shortcomings.  Recumbent Gallery (RG) rightly observe that there appears to be no space in this design for the usual envelope needed to mount and use a normal crank drive.  RG suggests this could be overcome by fitting some kind of linear drive.  But once you have grasped the idea of using fixed structural elements to define the edge of the fabric form what is to stop you from adding some similar constraint to further define the shape in the middle, as this design already does toward the rear?

The possibilities from this approach have a lot of potential both to help reduce weight and cost, and also thereby to help reduce the cost of delivery of the product to the end user.  It seems to be an ideal way to take Carl-Georg Rassmusen’s concept in the Leitra further, by surrounding the rider(s) in a protective cadge, sealed with an even lighter covering.  My only misgiving would be concern over material durability in the real world, where the fabric cover would have to face up, not only to scuffs and rubs, but to sharps and cuts from both the natural and man made environments.

The constrained fabric cover, is already available in a primitive form, with Hase’s Klimax trike, a review of which is expected in the next issue of Velovision Magazine.  But there are other prospects in the offing.  RG also hints on a new fabric covered velomobile in development, from Czech recumbent makers AZUB, which will be the subject of the next post.